21 February 2011

White Papers & E-books: Lunch, Brunch, and Expert Advice

My favorite part of the job hunt is getting to hang out and talk to really interesting people in PR and marketing.  I'm not saying that the resume-tuning and cover letter-writing isn't interesting... okay fine- it's gotten really old at this point.  But what helps keep me going are the informational interviews I have with smart and experienced people- people I like to call experts.

Today I had brunch with a good friend of my sister, and also a dear friend of mine, Clara.  She's from Seattle, a graduate from Kellogg, and has funny stories about the Midwest. She's awesome.

You see, before Clara went to business school and before she started working at Deloitte, she too studied trees and puppies in undergrad.  While these majors don't carry over into the "real world" as well as say finance or computer science, they're rewarding in their own right.  Aside from being really interesting and cute, my undergrad education has taught me several fundamental principles that have helped me immensely with my job search and research.


Just a minor amendment to what I said earlier- I didn't study trees and puppies, not formally at least.  I studied psychology and sociology.  When choosing my major, I knew I was good with numbers and that I loved people.  And luckily, I still do (the degree isn't exactly refundable).

I love learning about people, what they do, where they live, what they eat, who they choose as friends, and of course the big "why" that lies behind all of these types of decisions.  Why do people do what they do?  I like to think that marketing takes that question one step further and asks, "And how do we get them to do more of what we want them to do?" 

That sounds creepy and manipulative, which in some ways, it can be.  However, more recent trends in marketing can really add value to a customer's interaction with a product or service.  For this reason, I am a huge fan of white papers and e-books.  They allow a company to provide valuable advice to existing and potential customers, while establishing the brand as a trusted resource.
White papers are generally meant to address a specific topic or issue, aiding the decision-makers of a business or tech audience.  They allow a company to provide expert advice, and should in no way resemble a sales pitch.  People don't trust someone who "wants to help," and who also sounds like a sleazy/greasy used car salesman. 

E-books are "like a hip younger sibling to the nerdy white paper" (Scott, 143).  The subject can be less directly related to the company, and more focused on just being interesting and buzz-worthy.  That is, if white papers go for depth of reader interest, then e-books go for breadth of readership.


White papers and e-books are just two of the many ways a company can become the go-to expert on a topic.  Webinars, blogs, and A/V content are also great tools to use as part of an integrated content strategy. For instance, after completing Hubspot's Inbound Marketing University webinars, I continue to visit the Hubspot blog on the regular to learn about new trends in SEO/SEM.

I learned most of what I know about white papers and e-books from the atypical page-turner, by David Meerman Scott, titled The New Rules of Marketing and PR.  It's like the Sparknotes for anything you could ever ask about SEM.  And in the day and age of the internet, Sparknotes really falls into a moral grey area of working harder vs. working smarter, right?

In any case, Scott's book is an amazing resource for working smarter.  So I will reiterate the most important part of his message about white papers and e-books: content itself isn't enough- it must be valuable and interesting.  Useless/boring/deceitful/insert-adjective-describing-your-ex content is worse than no content at all.  Customers won't choose brands and products they do not trust.

Trusted advice is invaluable.  This I can say from all the emails, phone chats, lunches, brunches, and coffees I've had with experts, many of whom I now value as friends.  They've been generous with their advice, and acted as mentors during a rather uncertain time, which I appreciate wholeheartedly.  And I'm sure if any of them ever approach me down the line, and have dramatically changed career paths, I will very happily buy AVON products from them.  And that, ladies and gentlemen, is lead generation which I will save for another day.

08 February 2011

OkCupid & Me: It was just a fling

While I don’t want to make this blog all about me, I’ll preface this post with my reasons for writing about OkCupid (besides the upcoming Valentine's Day). I’ve always liked to think of myself as a pretty liberal and adventurous person. But when it comes to dating, I’m a little more traditional. That is, up until 6 months ago, the idea of online dating was terrifying to me. From my mom’s advice and a few after school specials, I’d learned that it was how bodies ended up in dumpsters and down streams.

I only considered online dating as a possibility when I graduated college and was living in a new city. Hitherto, I was in the dating cesspool that is Northwestern’s “dating scene”- but that’s another story.

So when a friend suggested online dating, I was hesitant but not completely opposed. I immediately ruled out eHarmony and Match.com. One was reputed to being homophobic, and I had seen commercials for the other one, which was all wedding bells and finding “the one.” So there I was, 22, a recent grad, and just looking for a fun date.

I ended up choosing OkCupid. I felt more comfortable with it because I had a few friends on the site already in other cities. 

Within the first week on the site, I had already exchanged messages with a lot of interesting people (a few creeps scattered between- one person asked if he could be my “personal slave” *shudder*). Most of the dates I went on were also great. I was happy to be out exploring the city with other young people- and I was happy to have discovered online dating.
 

But here I am now, 6 months later, single and about to delete my profile. Why?- and that is what the people at OkCupid should be asking me. Except they aren’t, at least not in any meaningful way.


So what’s the problem? The problem is that OkCupid has not created a dialogue between itself as a brand and the people on the site. Besides providing a space for people to meet, they aren’t adding any more value to their members’ dating experiences. OkCupid should be constantly thinking of ways to improve my dating experience… and by “my” I mean “our.”

Don’t they know who their members (customers) are? We are single, frustrated, and in need of relationship and dating advice. Why else would we be online dating?


The first thing OkCupid needs to do is start asking the right questions:


ID personas: Who is on our site and why are they here?
Goal: Identify who is frequenting the website and their dating needs.
This already includes basics like age, sex, and location (a/s/l – remember the chat room days? Good riddance). But they should also ask members about how long they’ve been single or if they even are single. They should also ask about previous challenges people have had with dating. They can get creative with these questions. If these questions sound invasive, they aren't nearly as personal as some of the match compatibility questions that already exist.

This information should be used to guide their SEM strategy. It can give insight as to what searches these personas are likely to be conducting on Google. This can inform them of the keywords they should be bidding on or keeping an eye on.

Blog and discussion forum: What questions are members asking? What topics do people want to read about?

Goal: The forum is a place for people to discuss and share their dating experiences. As a first time online dater, I would have loved to hear people talk about their experiences with OkCupid. The forum would be a place for people to discuss just about anything- dating with a language barrier? Dating with a large age difference?


Right now there’s OkTrends, which is great if you’re a sociologist and want to conduct a study with bad data. I can’t even begin to lament the flawed sampling and erroneous conclusions of causation. But it does make for a great headline- “iPhone users have more sex.” So are they saying that people with Androids should just give up altogether?



This blog adds no value to my dating experience. I want to know what relationship experts are saying about love, long distance relationships, cheating, break-ups, and dating across cultures. The list is really endless. Admittedly, I’ve Googled “why do girls like jerks more than nice guys?” It would have been great if OkCupid were there to tell me something about it. Instead I found the answer at Psychology Today (it's really a great article- and by an NU alum!).

The improved blog will be a place for OkCupid to build its brand as having dating expertise- not just data, which is all their blog is right now. Even people who aren’t interested in online dating will be drawn to the blog. And the result: OkCupid will be talked about by other bloggers, have more inbound links, and move up on the list generated anytime a person Googles “online dating.” I’m honestly stumped as to why OkCupid doesn’t already have a searchable blog with dating advice from experts.

OkCupid really needs to invest more time and energy in bringing in new members and member retention. After all, a dating site is only as good as the quality and quantity of its members.
So here's my hint to OkCupid:

Dating doesn’t end after the first date. There's a lot that happens after that, and you should be there because it gets WAY more interesting. You have a wealth of information at your fingertips, and more importantly, members ready and willing to answer your questions. So do it!


Up until now, it’s not been a question that OkCupid has been a successful startup. In fact, they were just bought by Match.com for $50 million. But being competitive in the digital world isn't just about one-time visitors. It's about creating loyal customers, who trust your brand and turn to you for valuable information. I really do want to feel like OkCupid has my back after a terrible, horrible, no good, very bad date.


Looking for more love advice?
Check out LoveShack to answer your dating questions.

07 February 2011

Bing and Google - Best Friends

For my current job hunt, I've been learning a lot about search engines and what it takes to get your brand to the top, literally. Different search engines use different algorithms and metrics to determine what pages turn up for organic searches and in what order they turn up. I've always relied heavily on Google for most of my internet-ing needs (email, RSS, & gchat), so today I decided to try something different and explore Bing. I was curious to see how the search results would differ between Google and Bing.

I went to the Bing homepage (note: I searched "Bing" in my Google search bar. Old habits die hard). The page itself looks cool- today they're featuring Bassano del Grappa. And if you pan across the page, it gives you bits of trivia about the Italian town.


So then the question was what to search? Just then my iTunes changed to a song by Yuksek, a DJ that I've been really into lately. He has amazing remixes of artists I love (Chromeo, Amanda Blank, and even Lady Gaga). He's also easy on the eyes.... very, very easy on the eyes.

The top 10 search results were about the same, though in a slightly different order. There was his official site, Wikipedia page, and Myspace in the top 3 for both search engines. I was surprised to find that he doesn't own the yuksek.com URL. Hmm... poor SEM strategy on his part. Or maybe he should have chosen a different stage name with an available URL.

Google did generate one unrelated search result, and on the first page too! It was a Turkish site. While I'll give them credit that "yĆ¼ksek" is a Turkish word, this is definitely not what I was looking for. Bing, on the other hand, led me to this awesome NME (New Musical Express) page, which linked me to more Yuksek music and news. How did this NME page not make it on the first page of the Google search results?

In any case, I browsed around the search results, and not surprisingly ended up going through an embarrassing number of pages of photos. I have to say that Bing is definitely not as strong for image searches. There were a lot of completely unrelated (and also pornographic) results in the first few pages. Through Google, I found a lot of pictures of Yuksek and Brodinski, another great DJ. They're such cute friends!





I always think it's cute when celebrities are friends. Something about it makes them a little more human, and it always makes me wonder what they gossip about over lunch. Life goals? Work? Dating? Indigestion?

Anyways, in the question of Bing vs. Google, I have to say that I'll loyally continue using Google. The search results on Bing were similar to the ones on Google, and there was no added value in their features (related searches, shopping, etc). Also, as long as I use gmail, google reader, gchat, and google maps for my iPhone, I can't think of any incentive to stray. I welcome any suggestions as to why you prefer Bing over Google, or any other search engine for that matter.

Bing hasn't proven its worth to me just yet, even though I think it has the potential to further differentiate itself in the future. Or they just have to wait for Google to completely screw up- which remains doubtful.

If you're interested in Yuksek's music, check out some of the downloads available at the RCRD LBL blog. My friend Elliott, also known as my music conscience, showed me this blog- it's great.

To end on the best friends note, here's me and mine:

I'm going to see her this weekend and we're each going to have a bottle of wine and pizza on Valentine's Day.

Also, check out her tumblr Meet the Chans.